05Grice's maximsInterpretiveSample on Nope (2022)
Dialogue Autopsy
Example analysis of Nope (2022), screenplay by Jordan Peele. Shown for demonstration and commentary. It reads a finished film to show the format, so anything it flags may well be deliberate; on your own draft, treat each flag as a question.
Also on: Parasite (2019)
Moderate subtext that deepens as the script goes on
- Subtext
- Moderate
- How much of the meaning is left implied.
- On the nose
- About one line in three
- Lines that say exactly what they mean. Fewer is better.
How to read this
The line follows how much each scene leaves unsaid: high where characters talk around what they mean, low where they state it outright. Hover a point to see how many of that scene's exchanges are on the nose.
The ticks under the line mark the scenes of the flagged lines quoted in the next section. A tick says where a flagged line comes from, not how much subtext the whole scene has.
A shaded stretch is the range of scenes chosen elsewhere in the report.
The scenes of the five flagged lines quoted below: 10, 13, 68, 80 and 97.
OJ's laconic dialogue runs on subtext. Silence and short phrases like 'Nope' and 'I see you' carry most of the emotional and thematic weight.
Holst's cryptic, poetic voice turns talk about cinematography into a philosophy of the gaze and of death.
The animal-training jargon ('Don't look him in the eyes,' 'Bang') comes back as survival rules, so the film builds one consistent symbolic language.
OJ and Em's relationship is mostly shown through action and shared history. Their last exchange, in scene 199, has no words in it and says more than any line in the script. Sc. 199
Five lines say too much, three of them Emerald's
- Sc. 10
Unprompted exposition. The scene stops dead so the film can hand its thesis straight to the audience.
EMERALDNow did you know that the very first assembly of photographs in sequential order to create a motion picture was a two second clip of a Black man on a horse...?
- Sc. 13
A direct plea that spells out the siblings' subtext. It plays like a therapy session, when these two usually keep their guard up.
EMERALDyou’re really making me feel like I’m not loved. Is that how you want your little sister to feel?
- Sc. 68
A blunt statement of fear that cuts against her 'get the shot' drive. The turn in her arc is announced in a line rather than motivated from inside.
EMERALDIt’s too much. Bro, I ain’t never seen no shit like this. It ain’t worth it.
- Sc. 80
Jupe states his delusion outright and names the creature, so the audience never gets to work out slowly, and with horror, what he believes.
JUPEWe are being surveilled by an alien species I call the 'Viewers.' Though they’ve yet to emerge from their ship, I believe they trust me.
- Sc. 97
A flat emotional declaration. It says aloud the terror the scene already shows, and the cliché undercuts the visual horror.
ANGELWe’re fucked.
Characters often announce how they feel, most of all in high-tension scenes, and the visual horror deflates.
Theme often arrives in monologue instead of drama: characters state the film's ideas about spectacle and exploitation outright.
Angel keeps acting as the audience surrogate. He asks 'What is that?' or says 'We're fucked,' and puts into words a tension that could stay internal and visual.
Emerald's 'hustler' persona sometimes lapses into on-the-nose pitch language. She ends up selling the plot to the audience instead of to the other characters.
For the next draft
- Several scenes let characters name their feelings outright: 'I'm scared,' 'this is crazy.' Most of those scenes already show the emotion in what people do, so the line repeats what the audience has just seen. Which of those lines would you miss if they went?
- In scene 10 Em is running a safety meeting, and the Muybridge speech turns it into a lecture. Could she pitch the Haywood legend to the crew as a sales line and leave the thesis underneath for the audience to find?
- Silence gives OJ's few lines their weight, but in scenes carried by dialogue alone the audience can lose track of what he wants. Where would one more line from him help?
Five voices, no two alike
With the names covered, a reader could still tell each of these voices apart. OJ and Holst leave the most unsaid; Angel says the most outright.
Simple vocabulary; clipped, laconic.
- Subtext
- Strong
Keeps saying Mmm / You good? / Nope
- So terse that his inner state sometimes goes opaque. In scenes carried by dialogue alone, the audience can lose him.
OJWhat’s a bad miracle? They got a word for that?
Moderate vocabulary; rambling, fast-talking, performative, then blunt.
- Subtext
- Moderate
Keeps saying Ayo / I’m gonna take you to Oprah / bro
- Her 'hustler' persona can tip into on-the-nose exposition when she's selling a plan. She sounds like a pitch deck instead of a person.
EMERALDNow did you know that the very first assembly of photographs in sequential order to create a motion picture was a two second clip of a Black man on a horse...?
Moderate vocabulary; nervous, rambling, tech-support patter.
- Subtext
- Weak
Keeps saying Bro / I mean... / over
- An audience surrogate to a fault. He often says out loud the exact fear or question the viewer has, and the tension goes flat.
ANGELThey’re either intergalactic travelers looking for peace, or they’re evolved futuristic humans coming back in time to stop us from destroying the planet, or... world killers.
Moderate vocabulary; polished, practiced, showman's cadence with a manic undercurrent.
- Subtext
- Moderate
Keeps saying Yeah, totally / So... / I'll tell you what
- His Star Lasso Experience monologue (scene 80) is necessary exposition, but it over-explains his philosophy and shrinks the mystery.
JUPEWhat if I told you that in about an hour you’ll leave here different.
Sophisticated vocabulary; formal, cryptic, gravelly, poetic.
- Subtext
- Strong
Keeps saying Horse girl / impossible shot / That's impossible
HOLSTWe don’t deserve the impossible.
Run Dialogue Autopsy on your own draft.
€17 for a feature-length script, up to 120 pages. Shorter scripts cost less. No account needed. Your script is deleted as soon as the analysis has run, or after an hour if it doesn't run. The report is deleted 24 hours after it is made.
Analyse my script