Sample report · 9 instruments
Nope (2022): The complete report
Example analysis of Nope (2022), screenplay by Jordan Peele. Shown for demonstration and commentary. It reads a finished film to show the format, so anything it flags may well be deliberate; on your own draft, treat each flag as a question.
How to explore this report
Click a character in any panel to follow them through the others. Drag across the emotion strip to focus a range of scenes; the charts that run along the script follow the same range.
A bar at the foot of the screen says what is selected. Esc clears it, and the address bar keeps the selection, so the link opens this same view.
Also as a sample: Parasite (2019)
Jump toEmotional Rhythm Strip
01PlutchikInterpretive
Emotional Rhythm Strip
Is my script dragging? If so, where does the emotional energy flatten out?
Tension leads 79 of 208 scenes
The arc: rise, fall, rise, fall, rise. The film opens on shock and dread: the Gordy attack, seen from under a table. It then settles into slow-burn tension as strange things happen on the ranch. The Star Lasso Experience (scene 80) and the night siege at the house turn that tension into horror, with pockets of dark comedy in between. In Act Three OJ and Em outwit the creature, and the film ends on hard-won hope and relief.
Across the whole script
- Tension
- Fear
- Dread
- Anxiety
- Hope
- Amusement
- Surprise
- Wonder
- OtherTen more emotions, which lead the other 26 scenes: relief, anger, sadness, grief, triumph, warmth, disgust, empathy, joy and longing.
Audience emotion, scene by scene
How to read this
Each row is one of the eight emotions felt most across the script, and each column is a scene. The taller the bar, the more strongly the audience is expected to feel that emotion there. When a scene is led by an emotion without a row of its own, the last row, Other, draws that lead. The line underneath is the scene's overall intensity.
Select a scene to read it below. With a mouse, drag across the strip to zoom into a range; in a full report, the other scene charts follow. On a phone, tap or drag along the line. From the keyboard, focus the strip and step through scenes with the arrow keys.
A small triangle over a scene marks genre drift: the scene plays a different emotion from the one the genre leads an audience to expect.
Each emotion, scene by scene
Tension
Fear
Dread
Anxiety
Hope
Amusement
Surprise
Wonder
Other
Line: overall intensityGenre drift
Scene 1 selectedINT. GORDY'S HOME! SET. DAY
Dread leads, at strong intensity and a slow pace.
Aftermath of a violent chimp attack on a sitcom set, viewed from the victim's perspective under a table.
blood-splattered cream colored couch
one drop of blood on the shoe almost makes it seem as if it’s winking
Gordy stops and looks under the table at us. He sees us.
- Dread: strong
- Fear: strong
- Disgust: moderate
- Sc. 54, 83
Slow-burn dread gives way, without warning, to horror: the decoy horse spun into the air in scene 54, the crowd swallowed in scene 83.
- Sc. 38, 48 +1
Humour works as a release valve. Three times (scenes 38, 48 and 129) it arrives mid build-up and lets the tension out early.
- Sc. 68
The emotional core is OJ and Em. Their standoff over staying on the ranch (scene 68) keeps the cosmic horror human.
- Sc. 22, 75 +1
The Gordy flashbacks (scenes 22, 75 and 76) run a second trauma beside the main story: two animals nobody can predict.
Act Three turns survival horror into a Western showdown: Em alone at Jupiter's Claim, with a balloon for bait.
Plays as horror, sci-fi and thriller, and partly as drama and comedy
Sci-fi horror with thriller and dark comedy elements.
HorrorStrong fit
- Graphic chimp attack and its aftermath
- Body horror during the Star Lasso abduction
- Sustained dread and jump scares (e.g., alien face in camera)
- Monstrous entity stalking and consuming victims
- Occasional comedic banter between Em and OJ
- Satirical jabs at Hollywood and spectacle culture
Sci-fiStrong fit
- UFO/UAP as central antagonist
- Speculative biology of the creature
- Technological surveillance and countermeasures
- Themes of observation and non-human intelligence
- Slow-burn Act One with family drama
- Lack of traditional alien invasion tropes
ThrillerStrong fit
- High-stakes cat-and-mouse sequences
- Ticking-clock tension during the final plan
- Protagonists using wits to survive
- Suspenseful set pieces (e.g., OJ in the shed, Em on the motorcycle)
- Deliberate pacing in early ranch scenes
- Extended character moments that pause action
DramaPartial fit
- Grief over Otis Sr.'s death
- Sibling relationship and legacy of Haywood Ranch
- Jupe's trauma and exploitation of the Gordy incident
- Family legacy and its erasure
- Graphic violence and horror elements
- Sci-fi premise overshadows dramatic realism
ComedyPartial fit
- Wry humour in dialogue (e.g., 'nope', 'Oprah shot')
- Satirical portrayal of TMZ and spectacle culture
- Absurdist elements like the sky dancers and decoy horse
- Overall dark and horrific tone
- Comedy is sporadic and often ironic
Three scenes bring amusement where the genre expects tension or dread
- Sc. 38
Brings amusement where the genre expects tension. Angel's rant about UFOs and his ex-girlfriend is played for laughs and lets out some of the dread the ranch has built.
- Sc. 48
Brings amusement where the genre expects tension. The Park kids' alien prank ends with OJ nearly throwing a punch. It plays as mischief, and the eerie mood drains away for a moment.
- Sc. 129
Brings amusement where the genre expects dread. Holst sings 'Purple People Eater' at the tense dinner. The absurdity sits right up against the life-or-death stakes of the next morning.
For the next draft
- Scene 48's aliens turn out to be the Park kids in costume, six scenes before the decoy horse is spun into the air in scene 54. The prank teaches the audience that a scare on this ranch can be fake. How much of that doubt do you want them carrying into scene 54?
- Holst sings 'Purple People Eater' at the dinner in scene 129, the last quiet scene before the plan starts at dawn. Is the laugh there to reset the tension so the climax can build it again?
- Moments after refusing to be moved until he gets his photo, the TMZ reporter dies in scene 172, and the timing lands as a punchline. Do you want a laugh there, in the middle of the final plan?
02Murray SmithInterpretive
Structure of Sympathy
Is my protagonist compelling? Is the audience rooting for the people I want them to root for?
The audience roots most for OJ Haywood, Emerald Haywood and Angel Torres, least for Ricky 'Jupe' Park
How to read this
Murray Smith's three levels of engagement. Recognition: the audience can pick the character out and remember them. Alignment: we follow the story at their side and get into their head. Allegiance: we are on their side.
Each level is the model's estimate, given as a band. A level that is the same for every character is given once, under the rows. Select a row to follow that character through every panel; Esc clears it.
OJ is in more than two scenes in five and stays emotionally opaque throughout. The audience has to lean in to read him.
- Sc. 76
Sympathy for Jupe is never higher than in his flashback in scene 76, which is why his hubris four scenes later lands as tragedy.
- Sc. 10
Allegiance moves from Emerald (scene 10) to OJ (109, 160) and back to her at 199. Their skills and flaws fit together, and the film runs on both.
Holst is the cautionary tale. His death follows directly from the film's central theme: spectacle destroys the people who chase it.
Emerald Haywood gains the most sympathy by the end; the audience turns against Ricky 'Jupe' Park
Allegiance by scene, 1–208
How to read this
One chart per character, all on the same scale and the same scenes, so their heights compare and a scene lines up down the column. Above the dashed neutral line the audience is on the character's side; below it, against them.
Dots are the scenes the analysis measured; the larger dot is the last. Ochre rings mark the shifts listed under the charts. A shaded band is the range of scenes picked elsewhere in the report. Select a name to follow that character through every panel.
- Sc. 5
OJ Haywood: sympathy rises sharply when a nickel falls from the sky and kills his father.
- Sc. 10
Emerald Haywood: sympathy rises with her proud speech about her family's uncredited legacy. There is more to her than the flakiness.
- Sc. 76
Sympathy for Jupe is highest in the Gordy flashback, where we see him as a traumatised child survivor.
- Sc. 80
Ricky 'Jupe' Park: sympathy drops when the Star Lasso show turns deadly. Horses and people pay for his hubris.
- Sc. 109
Sympathy surges when OJ works out the 'don't look' rule and saves Em and Angel.
- Sc. 160
Sympathy rises again as OJ risks his life for the despicable TMZ reporter.
- Sc. 184
Sympathy for Holst drops when he abandons the team for a suicidal pursuit of the 'impossible shot.'
- Sc. 199
Sympathy for Emerald climbs highest when she gets past her fear and beats the creature with her own plan. Her arc from hustler to hero is complete.
Antlers Holst is seen only from the outside
OJ Haywood knows what the audience knows. Sympathy rises and ends sympathetic.
- Presence
- Strong
- Point of view
- Strong
- Inner life
- Moderate
Recognition. Introduced with a quiet, stoic demeanour and one specific skill, horse training, that sets him apart from the start. His catchphrase 'Nope' and his stillness under pressure are what the audience remembers him by. The 'Scorpion King' hoodie, and later the reflective safety gear, give him a silhouette that is easy to pick out.
Alignment. We experience the father's death and the first UFO encounter almost entirely through his perspective. We learn that Jean Jacket is an animal, not a ship, at the moment he works it out, so our knowledge keeps pace with his. We never get inside his grief over Otis Sr. We see only the outward signs: selling the horses, the stoicism.
Allegiance. His father's sudden death, and then his struggle to keep the family ranch, settle the rooting interest early. His protective instincts toward Emerald, despite their friction, and his bravery in saving the Ryder cement his moral standing. At the end he gives up his own escape to draw Jean Jacket away from Em, the most selfless act in the film.
Six moral cues that shape how we judge OJ Haywood
- Tries to save his father after the nickel strike.
- Refuses to sell the ranch to Jupe despite financial ruin.
- Rushes to Jupiter's Claim to save Lucky.
- Risks his life to try and rescue the TMZ reporter (Ryder).
- Uses his knowledge of animal behaviour to outsmart Jean Jacket without violence.
- Sacrifices his own safety to draw the creature away from Emerald.
For the next draft
- From Holst's death in scene 190 the story runs straight into the final action, and OJ and Em never stop long enough for the loss to register. Is that as much weight as you want his death to carry?
- Jupe goes from trauma survivor to feeding horses to the creature, and the script never shows how he got there. Would his first encounter with it, on screen, make the turn feel earned?
03Graph theoryStructural
Character Topology
Which characters hold my story together, and who is drifting at the edge of it?
OJ Haywood at the centre of a cast of 21
49 of the 210 possible pairs share at least one scene.
Cast map
How to read this
Each circle is a character. The more of the cast someone shares scenes with, the larger their circle and the nearer the centre they sit. A group shares a colour and a stretch of the ring. A line joins two characters who appear in a scene together, and the more scenes they share, the heavier the line.
Select a character on the map, or in the lists below, to light up everyone they share a scene with and open their details. Select them again, or press Esc, to clear.
Zoom with the buttons, a pinch, or ⌘/Ctrl and scroll; once zoomed in, drag to pan. On a small screen only the most connected names are shown until you zoom in. Every character is also in the list under the map.
OJ and Emerald share 60+ scenes and form a dense two-protagonist core. Every plot thread runs through them.
Jupe is the bridge between the Haywood story and the Gordy flashback cluster. His trauma is where the film's ideas about spectacle and predation meet.
Angel brings the siblings their cameras and their contact with the outside world, but stays at the edge of the family's emotional core.
Holst joins late and connects only to the core trio. When he is gone, the group loses its 'expert' knowledge.
Only OJ Haywood and Emerald Haywood meet more than half the cast
Placed by how many of the other 20 characters each one shares a scene with.
How to read this
Degree counts the other characters someone shares at least one scene with; the figure at the end of each row is that count.
Betweenness is the model's estimate of how often a character is the link between two others who rarely meet. It is stated as a band, strong, moderate or weak, and the dot sits in that band's third of the line.
Select a row to focus that character on the map and open their details.
13 more characters, each sharing scenes with four or fewer
Four groups, joined by two bridge characters
The Haywood Crew
Jupiter's Claim
Gordy's Home Flashback
Commercial Set
| Bridge character | Also shares scenes with |
|---|---|
| |
|
04Green & BrockExperimental
Narrative Transportation
Where is a reader likely to surface from the story, and which scenes let their attention wander?
The script steers attention firmly, strong on all four measures
The model expects most readers to track it closely, scene after scene.
The four are transportation (how completely a reader gets lost in the story), causal linearity (how tightly each scene follows from the one before), visual specificity (how concrete the imagery is) and audience synchrony (how alike different viewers would follow it).
Audience synchrony is experimental. It is the model's guess, from the pages alone, at how alike different viewers would follow the story; nobody's responses were measured. How the instruments are classified
The causal chain is tight. Each supernatural event triggers the next thing a character does, so the audience can always follow the logic.
Visual specificity is high. The action lines deal in concrete detail: a house key embedded in Ghost's flank, a pig on a church roof.
The final plan intercuts several camera perspectives. The audience watches it like a bank of surveillance monitors, all feeds at once.
Shifts into broad comedy, such as the Park kids' prank in scene 48, loosen the grip for a moment. Control of suspense stays high overall. Sc. 48
Six scenes risk breaking immersion, the first at scene 10
- Sc. 10
The safety meeting and Em's long run through Haywood history stop the momentum. It plays as exposition, and attention can drift.
- Sc. 21
Jupe's long tour of the Gordy room carries a lot of theme but slows the story, and attention may wander.
- Sc. 38
Angel's breakup story and UFO theories are funny, but they are a detour from the central mystery.
- Sc. 48
The Park kids' prank deflates the eerie atmosphere built up before it, and can break immersion.
- Sc. 129
The dinner scene with Holst's song introduces a tonal jolt that may pull the audience out of the life-or-death stakes.
- Sc. 150
The TMZ reporter's arrival and death matter to the plot, but they border on satire and could undercut the horror for some viewers.
05Grice's maximsInterpretive
Dialogue Autopsy
Is my dialogue too on-the-nose? Which characters all sound like the same person?
Moderate subtext that deepens as the script goes on
- Subtext
- Moderate
- How much of the meaning is left implied.
- On the nose
- About one line in three
- Lines that say exactly what they mean. Fewer is better.
How to read this
The line follows how much each scene leaves unsaid: high where characters talk around what they mean, low where they state it outright. Hover a point to see how many of that scene's exchanges are on the nose.
The ticks under the line mark the scenes of the flagged lines quoted in the next section. A tick says where a flagged line comes from, not how much subtext the whole scene has.
A shaded stretch is the range of scenes chosen elsewhere in the report.
The scenes of the five flagged lines quoted below: 10, 13, 68, 80 and 97.
OJ's laconic dialogue runs on subtext. Silence and short phrases like 'Nope' and 'I see you' carry most of the emotional and thematic weight.
Holst's cryptic, poetic voice turns talk about cinematography into a philosophy of the gaze and of death.
The animal-training jargon ('Don't look him in the eyes,' 'Bang') comes back as survival rules, so the film builds one consistent symbolic language.
OJ and Em's relationship is mostly shown through action and shared history. Their last exchange, in scene 199, has no words in it and says more than any line in the script. Sc. 199
Five lines say too much, three of them Emerald's
- Sc. 10
Unprompted exposition. The scene stops dead so the film can hand its thesis straight to the audience.
EMERALDNow did you know that the very first assembly of photographs in sequential order to create a motion picture was a two second clip of a Black man on a horse...?
- Sc. 13
A direct plea that spells out the siblings' subtext. It plays like a therapy session, when these two usually keep their guard up.
EMERALDyou’re really making me feel like I’m not loved. Is that how you want your little sister to feel?
- Sc. 68
A blunt statement of fear that cuts against her 'get the shot' drive. The turn in her arc is announced in a line rather than motivated from inside.
EMERALDIt’s too much. Bro, I ain’t never seen no shit like this. It ain’t worth it.
- Sc. 80
Jupe states his delusion outright and names the creature, so the audience never gets to work out slowly, and with horror, what he believes.
JUPEWe are being surveilled by an alien species I call the 'Viewers.' Though they’ve yet to emerge from their ship, I believe they trust me.
- Sc. 97
A flat emotional declaration. It says aloud the terror the scene already shows, and the cliché undercuts the visual horror.
ANGELWe’re fucked.
Characters often announce how they feel, most of all in high-tension scenes, and the visual horror deflates.
Theme often arrives in monologue instead of drama: characters state the film's ideas about spectacle and exploitation outright.
Angel keeps acting as the audience surrogate. He asks 'What is that?' or says 'We're fucked,' and puts into words a tension that could stay internal and visual.
Emerald's 'hustler' persona sometimes lapses into on-the-nose pitch language. She ends up selling the plot to the audience instead of to the other characters.
For the next draft
- Several scenes let characters name their feelings outright: 'I'm scared,' 'this is crazy.' Most of those scenes already show the emotion in what people do, so the line repeats what the audience has just seen. Which of those lines would you miss if they went?
- In scene 10 Em is running a safety meeting, and the Muybridge speech turns it into a lecture. Could she pitch the Haywood legend to the crew as a sales line and leave the thesis underneath for the audience to find?
- Silence gives OJ's few lines their weight, but in scenes carried by dialogue alone the audience can lose track of what he wants. Where would one more line from him help?
Five voices, no two alike
With the names covered, a reader could still tell each of these voices apart. OJ and Holst leave the most unsaid; Angel says the most outright.
Simple vocabulary; clipped, laconic.
- Subtext
- Strong
Keeps saying Mmm / You good? / Nope
- So terse that his inner state sometimes goes opaque. In scenes carried by dialogue alone, the audience can lose him.
OJWhat’s a bad miracle? They got a word for that?
Moderate vocabulary; rambling, fast-talking, performative, then blunt.
- Subtext
- Moderate
Keeps saying Ayo / I’m gonna take you to Oprah / bro
- Her 'hustler' persona can tip into on-the-nose exposition when she's selling a plan. She sounds like a pitch deck instead of a person.
EMERALDNow did you know that the very first assembly of photographs in sequential order to create a motion picture was a two second clip of a Black man on a horse...?
Moderate vocabulary; nervous, rambling, tech-support patter.
- Subtext
- Weak
Keeps saying Bro / I mean... / over
- An audience surrogate to a fault. He often says out loud the exact fear or question the viewer has, and the tension goes flat.
ANGELThey’re either intergalactic travelers looking for peace, or they’re evolved futuristic humans coming back in time to stop us from destroying the planet, or... world killers.
Moderate vocabulary; polished, practiced, showman's cadence with a manic undercurrent.
- Subtext
- Moderate
Keeps saying Yeah, totally / So... / I'll tell you what
- His Star Lasso Experience monologue (scene 80) is necessary exposition, but it over-explains his philosophy and shrinks the mystery.
JUPEWhat if I told you that in about an hour you’ll leave here different.
Sophisticated vocabulary; formal, cryptic, gravelly, poetic.
- Subtext
- Strong
Keeps saying Horse girl / impossible shot / That's impossible
HOLSTWe don’t deserve the impossible.
06AltmanInterpretive
Narrative Architecture
Does my story stay focused, or does the narration wander away from the people the audience is following?
Multiple focus: OJ shares the lead with four others
Several characters share the protagonist’s job, and the analysis is confident of this reading. Their stories meet in one time and place: the Haywood Ranch and Jupiter's Claim during the alien threat. Spatial hand-offs keep the strands closely linked. Sci-fi thriller and creature feature usually run on multiple focus, and so does this script.
Following map · 208 scenes
How to read this
Each block is a following unit: a run of scenes where the story stays with one character or group. Units that follow OJ, alone or in a group, are in the dark colour; the rest are grey. Pale gaps are scenes no unit covers.
The rows below give each character or group a line of its own, with the number of scenes it is followed for. Choose a row to pick out that character; Esc clears it. With a mouse you can also choose a block in the band.
Whole script
- Sc. 1
Scene 1 shows the Gordy aftermath with no protagonist present. From the start, the film moves by abrupt hand-offs.
- Sc. 2–29
OJ anchors scenes 2 to 29. After that the camera shares time with Emerald, Angel and Jupe, as the plan becomes a group effort.
The big set pieces (first encounter, Star Lasso, final showdown) cross-cut between several observers, which keeps the tension up.
- Sc. 83
Scene 83, inside the saucer, tells the audience what the heroes don't know. That gap is where the dread comes from.
- Sc. 189–208
Emerald is a secondary focus for most of the film. The final stretch (scenes 189 to 208) follows her alone, so her victory feels earned.
Four notes on the genre fit
Ensemble focus typical of event thrillers, with multiple viewpoints converging on a central threat.
The focus on spectacle and observation suits a genre built on the unseen.
Flashback structure and subplots (Jupe, Holst) add texture without derailing momentum.
Act Three narrows to Emerald and OJ, so both arcs can close.
9 of 13 changes of focus are spatial hand-offs
The map above shows 13 changes of focus; the analysis describes eight of them.
How to read this
A change of focus is where the story stops following one character and starts following another. Altman names three kinds. A spatial hand-off (metonymic) passes attention between characters who share a space. A thematic cut (metaphoric) links two stretches by likeness or contrast. An abrupt jump (hyperbolic) has no bridge at all.
Quiet scenes are the ones a coverage reader might call dead: little action, little plot. They are listed because they keep the audience close to a character. Focus leakage is a scene without the character, or characters, the story follows.
- Sc. 1
Abrupt jump from prologue image to OJ's ranch.
The Shoe to OJ, an abrupt jump
- Sc. 30
Cut from OJ outside to Emerald inside the house during the power failure.
OJ to Emerald, a spatial hand-off
- Sc. 75
Thematic cut to Jupe's memory triggered by Gordy's Home discussion.
OJ / Emerald to Jupe, a thematic cut
- Sc. 80
Spatial hand-off to Jupe's show at the nearby theme park.
Emerald to Jupe, a spatial hand-off
- Sc. 85
Unconnected jump from inside the saucer back to OJ arriving at the scene.
The Abducted to OJ, an abrupt jump
- Sc. 89
Cut from OJ at Jupiter's Claim to Emerald at the ranch during the rain.
OJ to Emerald, a spatial hand-off
Five quiet scenes earn their keep
- Sc. 13
Tense truck ride reveals sibling dynamics and establishes OJ's burden.
Following OJ and Emerald
- Sc. 25
Quiet drinking scene deepens their backstory and emotional connection.
Following OJ and Emerald
- Sc. 70
OJ stares at the nickel that killed his father. It keeps his motive in view.
Following OJ
- Sc. 113
Fast-food scene allows characters to bond and OJ to articulate his theory.
Following OJ, Emerald, Angel
- Sc. 129
Holst's eerie song around the dinner table builds atmosphere and ensemble unity.
Following the team
Ten scenes away from the characters we follow, five of them described
Sc. 1, 22, 44, 83–84, 98, 102, 140, 148, 205
- Sc. 1
Prologue shows the aftermath of the Gordy attack, no protagonist.
Shows no character (the shoe)
- Sc. 22
Flashback to Gordy's rampage from Jupe's memory, breaks from OJ's alignment.
Shows Young Jupe
- Sc. 83
Inside the saucer, the audience learns the fate of the Star Lasso attendees without OJ.
Shows the Abducted Crowd
The audience learns something the characters we follow do not know.
- Sc. 98
Exterior shot of blood raining on the house, no character present.
Shows no character (blood rain)
- Sc. 140
Wide shot of the valley with sky dancers activating, no protagonist.
Shows no character (the sky dancers)
No beat for 96 scenes, then the climax at scene 206
Beats across 208 scenes
How to read this
Each dot is a beat, placed at its scene, with its scene number above it where there is room. The larger the dot, the bigger the surprise the analysis reads in that moment. The upright marks are the act breaks, and the acts are named beneath.
- Sc. 5
Act One sets up the Haywood siblings' world and the mystery of Otis Sr.'s death (scene 5) at a steady pace.
Act Two splits in half: the investigation and first encounter, then the rising threat and the planning.
The climax is a sustained, almost real-time sequence that pays off multiple character threads.
- Sc. 208
The resolution is short, and it lands. It closes on the 'I see you' gesture in scene 208.
Seven beats, scene by scene
- Sc. 5
Inciting incident. A nickel falling from the sky kills Otis Sr. and opens the mystery.
- Sc. 34
First act turn. OJ and Emerald decide to film the UFO and sell the footage.
- Sc. 82
Midpoint. The Star Lasso Experience turns into a massacre and shows what the alien can do.
- Sc. 97
Low point. The alien attacks the house, blood rains down, and the team is trapped.
- Sc. 109
Second act turn. OJ realises that not looking at the creature avoids its aggression. Now they have a plan.
- Sc. 206
Climax. Emerald lures the alien with the Lil' Jupe balloon until it chokes, and its cloud drifts away.
- Sc. 208
Resolution. Emerald sees OJ alive on Lucky. They have both survived.
Five motifs recur, and seven scene pairs rhyme
Motif map
How to read this
Each row is a recurring image, object or phrase, and each mark a scene where it appears; a run of consecutive scenes draws as one bar. The list under the map gives every scene.
With a mouse, point at a mark to see its scenes and slugline. With a keyboard, Tab moves from one motif to the next, and the arrow keys move along a motif's marks.
- The Bloody Shoe
- Sc. 1, 21, 76
- What spectacle leaves behind. Mary Jo's shoe turns up after the Gordy attack and again in Jupe's collection: the cost of looking.
- The Fist Bump
- Sc. 21, 76, 109, 199, 208
- A gesture of connection, first between Gordy and Jupe, then between OJ and Emerald. It becomes their way of saying 'I see you'.
- Sky Dancers
- Sc. 15, 120, 126, 140, 144, 148, 170
- Wild, uncontrollable energy at first. Later the team uses them as bait to defeat the alien.
- The Viewfinder / Camera Eye
- Sc. 10, 71, 141, 178, 208
- The wish to capture the impossible, and the danger of framing reality.
- The Well & Coin (Jupe Jangle)
- Sc. 18, 201, 203, 206
- Token of false spectacle at Jupiter's Claim; Emerald uses it to trigger the camera and defeat the alien.
- Sc. 1, 21 +1
The shoe (scenes 1, 21, 76) ties the chimp attack to the alien threat. Both are spectacle gone wrong.
The fist bump starts as a contractual gesture with Gordy and becomes a family code between OJ and Emerald.
- Sc. 15
Sky dancers sit in the background from scene 15. By the climax the same props carry life-or-death stakes.
Binary oppositions are well-balanced until the finale, where survival and family supersede spectacle and individual desire.
- Sc. 208
The 'I see you' echo lands in scene 208. Viewers who noticed it earlier get the payoff.
Some setups, like the praying mantis on the camera, are there for comic relief. They work on those terms.
Three thematic oppositions, each evenly split
Both at once in scenes 150 and 199.
The desire to see and be seen (Jupe's show, the Oprah shot) constantly pulls against the animal instinct to look away and live.
Both at once in scenes 181 and 206.
Horses and the alien both resist domestication. OJ's training methods work in the end, which blurs the line.
Both at once in scenes 26 and 34.
Emerald's desire for fame clashes with OJ's duty to the Haywood name. Working together resolves it.
Seven echoes: three setups and payoffs, two mirrors and two inversions
- Sc. 1 → 76
The bloody shoe and Gordy's attack are first glimpsed in the prologue; scene 76 tells the full story of Jupe's trauma and survival.
Setup and payoff
- Sc. 22 → 80
Young Jupe hiding under a table during animal violence mirrors the audience huddled under tables at the Star Lasso Experience.
Mirror
- Sc. 5 → 206
Otis Sr. training Ghost to fall on command is inverted when Emerald 'brings down' Jean Jacket with a balloon and coin.
Inversion
- Sc. 26 → 199
Young OJ's 'I see you' eye-pointing gesture returns as Emerald's signal before the final ride.
Mirror
- Sc. 10 → 108
Lucky kicks at the VFX ball reflection; OJ later recalls this to deduce the alien hunts by eye contact.
Setup and payoff
- Sc. 15 → 140
Sky dancers first appear as roadside kitsch. By the end they are part of the final defence.
Setup and payoff
- Sc. 21 → 208
Jupe's Gordy's Home room monetises trauma. Emerald's photo is an unbought record of survival.
Inversion
For the next draft
- Clues to Jupe's secret show stay faint until the late payoff. How early does a viewer need to sense it for the reveal to feel planted?
- Angel's breakup runs beside the main story and never touches OJ and Em's stakes, so he stays the outsider. If it paid off once during the final plan, his survival would count for more.
- Neptune's Claim is glimpsed as a rival to Jupiter's Claim and never opened up, so it stays texture. What would the rivalry show about Jupe if it had one scene?
07DeweyInterpretive
Character Depth MRI
Does my character change, or do they just do things until the plot ends?
One of five characters completes the circuit; one more comes close
Ricky "Jupe" Park and Antlers Holst act without taking in what happens to them and Emerald acts without reflecting. For Angel Torres the break is narrow: the script still shows the phase where it falls.
How to read this
Each strip is Dewey's experience circuit in order: habit, the shock that disrupts it, weighing what to do, acting, undergoing what follows, and reflecting on it. Three blocks lit is strong, two moderate, one weak.
A dashed ochre outline marks the phase where the diagnosis says the circuit breaks. When that phase still has two or three blocks lit, the script shows it and the break is narrow. A weak habit is not a break: it means the character is not stuck in a routine.
Select a name to follow the character through the other instruments in a full report.
- CompleteDepthStrong
- Habit: moderate
- Disruption: strong
- Deliberation: strong
- Doing: strong
- Undergoing: moderate
- Reflection: moderate
Passive at first, stalled by grief and a failing business. Deliberate action and working with his sister carry him past avoidance and round the whole circuit.
- ImpulsiveDepthModerate
- Habit: moderate
- Disruption: strong
- Deliberation: moderate
- Doing: strong
- Undergoing: strong
- Reflection: weak, where the circuit breaks
Impulsive and self-promoting, she avoids deeper emotional work but eventually commits to family and legacy.
- AnaestheticDepthModerate
- Habit: strong
- Disruption: strong
- Deliberation: weak
- Doing: strong
- Undergoing: weak, where the circuit breaks
- Reflection: weak
All doing, no undergoing. He represses his trauma and sells the alien as a spectacle, which destroys him.
- PassiveDepthModerate
- Habit: moderate
- Disruption: strong
- Deliberation: moderate
- Doing: strong, where the diagnosis puts the break
- Undergoing: moderate
- Reflection: moderate
Initially passive after a breakup, he finds purpose through action but remains somewhat reactive.
- AnaestheticDepthModerate
- Habit: strong
- Disruption: moderate
- Deliberation: moderate
- Doing: strong
- Undergoing: weak, where the circuit breaks
- Reflection: moderate
He chases the impossible shot, cut off from the emotional cost, and in the end gives his life for the image.
08VonnegutExperimental
Audience Fit Analysis
What shape is my story, and which kind of audience is that shape most likely to reward?
A man-in-a-hole arc: fall, then rise
Fall into trouble, then climb back out. Films with this shape: Die Hard, Finding Nemo, The Martian.
Closest shapes
Each shape is drawn over this script's own fortune curve, smoothed, in grey.
Man in a hole fall, then rise
Strong fitThe story opens on a fall (father’s death, financial ruin), rises with the plan to capture the alien, dips again with the massacre and the attacks, then climbs to victory. That is the man-in-a-hole shape.
Cinderella rise, fall, rise
Partial fitThere is a rise-fall-rise pattern (hope, disaster, final victory) reminiscent of Cinderella, but the initial state is already low, so the first rise is truncated.
Rags to riches a steady rise
Weak fitThe continuous upward trajectory from the lowest point to the happy ending superficially resembles rags-to-riches, but the major setbacks prevent a smooth rise.
The story is about reclaiming legacy and agency in a world that erases you. The alien stands in for spectacle and exploitation.
The arc runs from grief and powerlessness after Otis Sr.’s death (scene 5) to Em’s win and the Oprah shot (scene 206). Sc. 5, 206
The setbacks are hard, the Star Lasso massacre worst of all. The ending still gives the audience the survival and justice it has been hoping for.
Fortune bottoms out at scene 82 and tops out at 208
It swings widely and leans to ill fortune. The script ends riding high.
How to read this
The line follows the main characters' fortune through the script. Above the middle line things are going well for them; below it, badly.
The analysis samples the script at intervals, drawn as dots, and joins the samples. The triangles above the chart are the turning points listed under it, pointing up for a rise and down for a fall.
Hover over or tap the chart to read a scene.
- Sc. 5
Fall EXT. HAYWOOD RANCH. OUTDOOR ARENA. DAY
A nickel falls from the sky and kills Otis Sr. The family's fortunes drop.
- Sc. 31
Fall EXT. HAYWOOD RANCH. FOOT OF THE SOUTHERN HILLS. NIGHT
OJ sees the mysterious object in the sky and Ghost disappears. The threat is real.
- Sc. 68
Rise EXT. HAYWOOD RANCH. VALLEY BASIN. SHED. NIGHT
OJ survives the shed and Em sees the alien. The team commits to filming it.
- Sc. 82
Fall EXT. JUPITER'S CLAIM. STADIUM. AFTERNOON
The Star Lasso Experience turns into a massacre as the alien devours the crowd.
- Sc. 115
Rise EXT. HAYWOOD RANCH. DRIVEWAY. DAY
Holst joins the team and they start on the plan. Hope surges.
- Sc. 190
Fall EXT. HAYWOOD RANCH. HILLY RIDGE. DAY
The plan succeeds as OJ scares the alien with flags, but Holst is then taken.
- Sc. 206
Rise EXT. JUPITER'S CLAIM. MAIN STREET. DUSK
Em defeats the alien with the balloon and gets the Oprah shot.
- Sc. 208
Rise EXT. JUPITER'S CLAIM. MAIN STREET. DUSK
Em sees OJ alive on Lucky, and the victory is complete.
Four of seven audiences fit strongly; the other three fit partly
How to read this
Audiences are listed from the closest fit down, so rows in the same band are still in order. Open a row to see what appeals to that audience and what gets in the way.
Personal integratorsSeeks prestige, sophistication, and cultural capital.Strong fit
All three measures read strong for personal integrators.
- Prestige
- Em's Muybridge speech in scene 10 ties the Haywoods to the first motion picture. That claim on film history is where the prestige comes from.
- Sophistication
- The script is about making images, from the commercial set in scene 10 to Holst's hand-cranked camera.
- Cultural capital
- Knowledge of Muybridge and film history adds depth.
- Appeal
Its satire of the film business, from Jupe's Gordy room to the TMZ reporter.
- Appeal
References to film history and visual culture.
- Appeal
Rewards repeat viewings.
- Friction, Sc. 84
Creature-feature gore, such as the victims inside the creature's digestive tract in scene 84, may put this audience off.
- Friction
The broad humour may undercut the sophistication for purists.
Social integratorsValues shared experiences, watercooler moments, and broad shareability.Strong fit
All three measures read strong for social integrators.
- Shareability
- Memorable images and quotes make it watercooler-worthy.
- Cultural relevance
- The TMZ reporter and the hunt for the Oprah shot are about how people watch now.
- Accessibility
- Accessible genre film with deeper layers.
- Appeal
Set pieces built to be retold (the Gordy attack, the sky dancers, Jean Jacket).
- Appeal
OJ's one-word 'Nope' is easy to quote.
- Appeal
Its take on media exploitation is topical.
- Friction
Graphic content may alienate some casual viewers.
- Friction
Complex themes may require post-viewing discussion to fully appreciate.
Eudaimonic viewersMeaning-seeking, tolerates tragedy if meaningful, and values philosophical depth.Strong fit
All three measures read strong for eudaimonic viewers.
- Meaning and purpose
- Explores legacy and the human cost of spectacle.
- Tolerance for tragedy
- Deaths are meaningful and serve the larger theme.
- Philosophical depth
- Raises questions about humanity’s relationship with nature and media.
- Appeal
Spectacle and exploitation, traced from Gordy to the Oprah shot.
- Appeal
The alien as a metaphor for the unknowable and the consequences of hubris.
- Appeal
Emotional weight of generational legacy and family.
- Friction
Genre conventions may feel too commercial for some eudaimonic seekers.
- Friction
The horror surface may obscure the deeper meaning for casual viewers.
Cognitive seekersCraves complex plots, intellectual challenge, and thematic depth.Strong fit
- Plot complexity
- Strong
- Layered narrative with flashbacks and thematic depth challenges the viewer.
- Intellectual challenge
- Strong
- Its ideas about media exploitation and animal behaviour invite analysis.
- Clarity of resolution
- Moderate
- Ending is clear but leaves room for interpretation.
- Appeal
Plenty of subtext about spectacle and exploitation.
- Appeal
Non-linear structure, including the Gordy flashback.
- Appeal
Animal behaviour as a metaphor for human nature.
- Friction
Horror elements may distract from intellectual engagement.
- Friction
Some viewers may find the monster logic too abstract.
Affective seekersWants to feel strongly, connect with characters and reach catharsis.Partial fit
All three measures read strong for affective seekers, but the analysis rates the overall fit as partial.
- Emotional depth
- Family bonds and grief carry it; the heroism lands.
- Character connection
- OJ and Em’s relationship feels lived-in and easy to recognise.
- Catharsis
- The final victory provides emotional release.
- Appeal
OJ and Em’s sibling bond feels real, friction included.
- Appeal
The theme of honouring a father’s legacy is moving.
- Appeal
The moments of sacrifice (Holst, OJ) land.
- Friction
The graphic deaths may drown out the quieter emotional beats.
- Friction
Some characters are underwritten (e.g., Holst).
Hedonic viewersPrefers positive resolution, avoids ambiguity, and seeks uplift.Partial fit
All three measures read strong for hedonic viewers, but the analysis rates the overall fit as partial.
- Positive resolution
- The heroes survive and succeed, and the ending is happy.
- Avoidance of ambiguity
- The monster is defeated, and the core conflict is resolved.
- Emotional tone
- Despite horror, the film ends on a hopeful, triumphant note.
- Appeal
Lead characters survive and achieve their goal.
- Appeal
The monster is vanquished in a satisfying way.
- Appeal
Family and survival win, and Em gets the Oprah shot.
- Friction
Many supporting characters are killed on screen, which may dampen the uplift.
- Friction
The journey is dark and stressful, and the hedonic viewer’s patience may run out.
Tension releasersSeeks escapism, resolved endings, and low cognitive load.Partial fit
- Escapism
- Strong
- High-concept monster movie provides thrills and spectacle.
- Cognitive load
- Moderate
- Demands attention to follow multiple plotlines, which may frustrate.
- Resolution satisfaction
- Strong
- Happy ending with villain defeated satisfies.
- Appeal
Big set pieces, the Star Lasso massacre above all.
- Appeal
Clear heroes and monster.
- Appeal
Definitive, upbeat conclusion.
- Friction
Viewers have to pay attention throughout.
- Friction
Dark themes and violence may be too intense for pure escapism.
09CrenshawExperimental
Representation & Power
Who in my cast gets agency and an inner life, and where might I be leaning on a stereotype without noticing?
A moderate range of identities, and three perspectives sidelined
The script puts the Haywood siblings at the centre and hands the story to working-class Black characters, who are usually sidelined in sci-fi and horror. The antagonist is a force of nature. The systemic threat is a media ecosystem hungry for spectacle, and white characters stand for it (The Ryder, Holst's death drive).
- Told from
- The Haywood family legacy and their struggle for recognition and survival in an industry and world that consumes them.
- Sidelined
- Mary Jo Elliot (disabled woman, former teen star, now a veiled spectator at Jupe's show, consumed by the alien)
- Amber Park (Jupe's wife, exists only to support his delusion, has no interiority)
- The Park children (used as props in Jupe's show, their prank on OJ is their only agency)
- Range of identities
- ModerateHow broad the mix of identities is across the cast.
Puts a Black family at the literal origin of cinema, so their survival reclaims erased history.
OJ's animal-training philosophy is a metaphor for dealing with systemic oppression that never turns the characters into its victims.
Emerald is a full co-lead, flawed and clever. Her queerness is there without defining her or causing conflict.
Jupe's arc as a former child star of colour critiques Hollywood's consumption of marginalised performers without reducing him to a stereotype.
OJ Haywood and Emerald Haywood drive the plot; Otis Haywood Sr. serves OJ's story
Complex position · growth arc
Working-class Black man in his 30s, horse trainer, rural
- Drives plot
- Strong
- Makes choices
- Strong
- Inner life
- Moderate
- Humanised
- Strong
OJ Haywood's identities, stereotypes and notes
- Gender
- man
- Race/ethnicity
- Black
- Class
- working-class (struggling to keep family ranch afloat)
- Profession
- horse trainer/wrangler
- Age
- 30s (inferred from being Otis Sr.'s son and Em's older brother) (inferred)
- Stoic Black cowboy, subvertedOJ is quiet and reserved, the 'strong silent type'. The script makes that stoicism a tactical skill that comes from animal training: he watches, and watching is how he survives.
- Magical negro, avoidedOJ's knowledge is a trade skill (animal behaviour). He is the protagonist, with his own arc, so the trope has nothing to hold on to.
OJ's expertise in animal behaviour is the film's central logic. Authority and survival come from him, a working-class Black horse trainer.
His dyslexia comes up in passing ('you read it, dyslexic-ass') and never defines him. A learning disability is treated as ordinary.
His grief over his father's death drives him, and the script keeps it central. That is where his inner life comes from.
Complex position · growth arc
Working-class queer Black woman in her 20s-30s, hustler, performer
- Drives plot
- Strong
- Makes choices
- Strong
- Inner life
- Strong
- Humanised
- Strong
Emerald Haywood's identities, stereotypes and notes
- Gender
- woman
- Race/ethnicity
- Black
- Class
- working-class (financially struggling, mentions being broke)
- Age
- 20s-30s (younger sister of OJ, references to past events as a child) (inferred)
- Sexuality
- queer (mentions 'the girl I'm talking to' and a 'situation in Atwater texting me back') (inferred)
- Sassy Black woman, subvertedEm is outspoken and funny, which could read as the 'sassy sidekick'. She is a co-lead, with her own arc, her own skills (VFX, sewing, performance) and the film's thematic voice in the Muybridge speech. Her humour is how she survives, and it is a kind of intelligence.
- Irresponsible younger sibling, subvertedOJ first treats Em as a liability. She turns out to be the one the plan depends on: she sews the parachute, performs for the well camera and, in the end, saves them both.
Em's speech about Alistair E. Haywood (scene 10) reclaims a Black man erased from the start of cinema. It ties who she is to the film's theme of spectacle and exploitation. Sc. 10
Her queerness comes up casually and carries no stigma. It is one part of her life among others.
She is allowed to be scared and to be wrong, which takes her past the 'strong Black woman' trope.
Complex position · fall arc
Korean American former child actor in his 30s, now a theme park entrepreneur
- Drives plot
- Moderate
- Makes choices
- Strong
- Inner life
- Moderate
- Humanised
- Strong
Ricky 'Jupe' Park's identities, stereotypes and notes
- Gender
- man
- Race/ethnicity
- Korean American (described as Korean American)
- Class
- upper-middle-class (owns a theme park, offers to buy the ranch) (inferred)
- Age
- 35
- Profession
- former child actor, theme park owner
- Washed-up child star, played straightJupe fits the trope of a former child actor cashing in on past fame. The script links it to his trauma: after Gordy, he thinks the alien is a performer he can tame, and that mistake kills him.
- Model minority, avoidedJupe runs a successful business, but the script shows it as gaudy spectacle built on exploitation, which undercuts the model-minority reading.
Jupe's role as a Korean American adopted into a white sitcom family matches his position off camera: a person of colour performing for white audiences. The script uses it to critique how Hollywood consumes marginalised people.
The script takes his trauma from the Gordy attack seriously. It explains why he believes, wrongly, that he has a bond with predators.
His ethnicity is never the butt of a joke. His flaws belong to him as a character.
Marginalised · growth arc
Young working-class Latinx man, tech-savvy retail worker
- Drives plot
- Moderate
- Makes choices
- Moderate
- Inner life
- Moderate
- Humanised
- Strong
Angel Torres's identities, stereotypes and notes
- Gender
- man
- Race/ethnicity
- Latinx (described as Latinx)
- Class
- working-class (works retail at Fry's Electronics)
- Age
- 24
- Profession
- tech retail worker
- Tech nerd sidekick, subvertedAngel provides tech support, but his UFO obsession and his recent breakup give him a life outside the job. He is brave and resourceful, and he survives.
- Comic relief, subvertedAngel has funny lines, but his fear is real and the plan needs him.
Angel's Latinx identity is present but not central to his character; he is defined by his skills and personality.
His emotional arc (processing a breakup) adds a layer of humanity beyond the 'tech guy' function.
Privileged · fall arc
Older white male legendary cinematographer
- Drives plot
- Weak
- Makes choices
- Moderate
- Inner life
- Weak
- Humanised
- Moderate
Antlers Holst's identities, stereotypes and notes
- Gender
- man
- Race/ethnicity
- Caucasian (described as Caucasian)
- Age
- 60s
- Profession
- cinematographer (legendary cinematographer)
- Obsessed artist, played straightHolst is willing to die for 'the impossible shot'. That is the trope of the artist who sacrifices everything for the work, and the script plays it straight, as a cautionary tale about spectacle.
Holst is the old guard of cinema: white, male and obsessed with the image. His death is the script's critique of that extractive gaze.
Complex position · no arc
Working-class Black man in his 60s, founder of Haywood Hollywood Horses
- Drives plot
- Weak
- Makes choices
- Weak
- Inner life
- Weak
- Humanised
- Moderate
- Exists to serve OJ's story
Otis Haywood Sr.'s identities, stereotypes and notes
- Gender
- man
- Race/ethnicity
- Black
- Class
- working-class (owns a horse training ranch)
- Age
- 60s (father of adult children) (inferred)
- Profession
- horse trainer
- Wise father figure, subvertedOtis Sr. is a mentor, but his wisdom is practical and flawed. He dies suddenly and for nothing, struck by a nickel from the sky. What he leaves OJ is a burden.
He is killed by a falling nickel. The script makes the devaluation of Black labour in Hollywood literal.
- Sc. 70
He exists mainly to motivate OJ, who still stares at the nickel that killed him (scene 70).
- Limited screen time reduces him largely to a memory, though this serves the story's theme of legacy.
OJ Haywood is part of three of the four power relations
- Solidarity
OJ Haywood and Emerald Haywood. The siblings start with friction (OJ sees Em as a liability) and grow into partners who respect each other. The balance evens out as Em's skills prove essential.
Along race, class and gender
- Domination
Ricky 'Jupe' Park and OJ Haywood. Jupe holds economic power over OJ: he buys his horses and offers to buy the ranch. This mirrors Hollywood's exploitation of Black labour. Jupe is buying OJ's legacy.
Along class and race
- Mentorship
Antlers Holst and OJ Haywood. Holst, a legendary white cinematographer, dismisses OJ at first and comes to respect what he knows. They work together uneasily, and in the end Holst puts his art ahead of the team's safety.
Along race, profession and age
- Conflict
The Ryder (TMZ) and Emerald Haywood. The Ryder, a white male journalist, invades Em's property and waves off her warnings. He demands she perform for his camera. He is the extractive media gaze in person.
Along race, gender and profession
Four scenes where identities meet: one reinforces the hierarchy, one challenges it and two cut both ways.
How to read this
Each moment is a scene where two or more of a character's identities meet. Structural: they compound the character's situation. Political: loyalties to different groups pull against each other. Representational: the portrayal itself carries the charge.
Under each note: whose moment it is, which kind, and what the scene does to the hierarchy it shows.
- Sc. 10
Em gives her speech about Alistair E. Haywood, the Black jockey erased from cinema history. She ties her family to the birth of film and claims back a place Black people have been shut out of.
Emerald Haywood · Representational · Challenges the hierarchy
- Sc. 20
Jupe's office is a shrine to his role as 'Lil' Jupe' in 'Kid Sheriff', where he played a sidekick. As a Korean American child actor he supported white leads. As a theme park owner he now makes money from that marginalisation.
Ricky 'Jupe' Park · Representational · Cuts both ways
- Sc. 76
Young Jupe survives the Gordy attack because the chimp sees him as no threat. The 'connection' he remembers is his marginal place as the Asian child on a white sitcom, and it saved him. Being the cast's 'other' makes the trauma worse.
Ricky 'Jupe' Park · Structural · Cuts both ways
- Sc. 150
The Ryder (TMZ) brushes aside Em's authority on her own property and demands access and content. A white male journalist ignores a Black woman's 'no', and she has to perform a lie ('Verizon commercial') to protect her space.
Emerald Haywood · Structural · Reinforces the hierarchy
Six stereotypes subverted, two played straight
- Played straight
- Washed-up child star (Ricky 'Jupe' Park); obsessed artist (Antlers Holst)
- Subverted
- Stoic Black cowboy (OJ Haywood); sassy Black woman and irresponsible younger sibling (Emerald Haywood); tech nerd sidekick and comic relief (Angel Torres); wise father figure (Otis Haywood Sr.)
Every authority figure outside the Haywood family is white (Buster, Fynn, Holst, The Ryder). That is the industry power structure the Haywoods have to work within.
Women who are not Emerald are largely functional (Amber, Mary Jo, Bonnie Clayton) or victims.
The script's central metaphor, being eaten by spectacle, maps onto how the entertainment industry exploits marginalised people.
Female characters beyond Emerald lack interiority; Amber and Mary Jo are defined entirely by their relationships to Jupe.
Angel's Latinx identity is mentioned but never explored; he could be any ethnicity without changing the script.
The disabled character (Mary Jo) is a spectacle of trauma, brought on for a cameo and then consumed.
For the next draft
- Amber Park goes along with Jupe's plan and never gets a scene with her own view of it. One moment of held-back doubt would give her complicity an inner life.
- Nothing in Angel's scenes draws on his Latinx identity beyond the mention of it. Should it shape anything he says or does?
- Mary Jo appears mostly as a spectacle of her own trauma: veiled in the Star Lasso crowd, then consumed. Her choice to come to Jupe's show is never on the page. Is that choice worth a line?
Run the complete set on your own draft.
The complete set costs €69 for a feature-length script, up to 120 pages. Shorter scripts cost less. No account needed. Your script is deleted as soon as the analysis has run, or after an hour if it doesn't run. The report is deleted 24 hours after it is made.
Analyse my script